Recently, a video of an explicit video involving a brahmin BJP functionary went viral on social media.
While everyone is busy discussing if it was a trap or who set it, the facts remain untouched.
Here is my perspective of the untouched facts surrounding this incident:
Let’s take this step by step.
KT Raghavan’s privacy got invaded. No questions there. However, it was the woman who released it outside (with the YouTuber who made it public on social media) in the first instance with the intent of raising awareness about such activities within the political party.
If the video featured KT Raghavan’s wife, it is violation of his right to privacy.
However, it was a case of an extra-marital affair which got leaked. Therefore it is not just the violation of Kt raghavan’s privacy but also the fidelity he might have owed to his lawfully wedded wife.
A brahmin, wearing the sacred thread and vehemently supporting the idea of hindu-rashtra, asked a woman who is not his wife to show her private parts. He proceeded further to sit with his legs spread apart in front of statues of deities and stroked his private part.
On a different note, despite wearing the sacred thread and promoting hindu-rashtra, the brahmin guy has the same single private part as any other non-brahmin man. Therefore there is no morphological difference (or should I say abnormalities) that substantiates the idea of intelligent, superior and honourable caste identity. If he also has one like the others, why so much noise for the need for differentiation. KT Raghavan can and must also be treated as any other non-brahmin man. Let’s not digress from the question by going further in this direction.
Unless we have a testimony from the woman where she accepts to having trapped KT Raghavan, the idea of trap remains unverified. Multiple media outlets making a statement does not indicate any ‘factual’ nature unless those mentions present any evidence or statement from the concerned woman. Also, even if the woman accepts to having trapped KT Raghavan, that does not absolve him from the act of engaging in an act with a woman who is not his wife.
Now that we’ve cleared this fantasy of honey-trapping, let’s focus on the fact that the sacred thread or the statues of deities did nothing to prevent KT Raghavan from asking another woman to go naked on a video call. Poonal or the sacred thread also did not give KT Raghavan the reminder that he was doing something that ideally must be involving no one but him and his wife (with full consent of both).
The positive energy or as the famous sadguru jaggi vasudev puts it, ‘the vibrations’ from the statues of the deities or the ‘aura’ of the room they were arranged in did nothing to prevent KT Raghavan from displaying his private part and stroking it as he was trying to convince the woman at the other end to remove her clothing and display her private parts. I do humbly agree that my interpretation could be completely wrong. Please watch the video to confirm and frame your own interpretation. May be KT Raghavan went inside the room with statues of what people consider as hindu gods and their positive energy connected with his superior-by-birth intellectual capability and reminded him that the room had everything but a LINGAM. What KT Raghavan did next responded to the call from the positive energy and compensated the absence of the LINGAM in the room while also enabling his holy, honest and aanma-centric intent to convince a woman who is not his wife to remove her clothing and display her private parts. He did perform a few demo’s to break it down for the woman he was having the video chat with.
I consider this holy and under the shadow of the principles of the shastra from the north Indian pine trees because KT Raghavan did not lose his job. The YouTuber who got the video out lost his job and also his party membership. The woman and the other women with similar complaints are in deep trouble. Well, non-brahmins messing with a brahmin man wearing the almighty sacred thread are not going to be spared by the lord god the creator who gave KT Raghavan’s group (a specific group in our country) alone the holiest idea of building a nation on a religious platform.
K.Rangachari in Castes and Tribes of Southern India says that the sacred thread makes the sudra a brahmin. Going by that nd connecting it to what KT Raghavan did, it is clear that the brahmin becomes invincible, even if he were to compensate for the missing LINGAM sitting in front of statues of deities while convincing a woman who is not his wife to go naked like him on a peer-2-peer highly secure communication platform. Secure sampark with a hindu-rashtra-supporter could have a tinge of seduction and no believer shall bring in the concept of fidelity or the upbringing of the sanatan-dharma-supporter who demands equal response from another woman engaged with him on the samaved-inspired-sampark!!
KT Raghavan did not fall in a trap. The trap was felled by the LINGAM KT Raghavan brought into public domain while interacting with a woman who is not his wife. What an atrocious violation of his humble, born-intelligent, honourable, brahminical privacy!!!! Sambavami yuge yuge!!!
P.S. To those who do not feel very positive at the tone or angle this discussion presents, please remember, it is the same feeling that Tamils felt when KT Raghavan called Velupillai Prabhakaran a terrorist in news media debate. Picking up on traditional right wing template: Where were you when KT Raghavan insulted Velupillai Prabhakaran in news media debate??!! (relevant channel’s dramatic theme music plays in the background)
Best regards,
